Archive for the ‘Pet Insurance’ Category

So You Want To Kill Your Pet Huh ?

Tuesday, March 25th, 2008

In a post on his pet lovers blog, Gary Bogue has picked up on some statistics from a Californian pet insurance company that has analyzed their claim statistics to find the major causes of poisoning in our pets.

The article makes great reading and I guarantee that you’d never have guessed the single largest cause of pet poisoning, in fact it accounts for more claims than all of the other causes combined…it’s drug overdose !. It’s caused by well-meaning, kindly pet owners giving their pets human medications, typically pain relief remedies. It seems that most pets can’t metabolise even small doses of this type of medicine and a drugs overdose is a frequent result.

The other causes of pet poisoning are less surprising, with things such as rodent poisons, chocolate, poisonous plants, slug and snail bait etc all contributing to visits to the vet.

It’s a good article and a stern reminder to pay extra care with poisons around the home together with a stark warning that giving your pet medication intended for humans can have tragic consequences.

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Pet Insurance For The Old Timers - At A Price

Tuesday, January 29th, 2008

Liverpool Victoria have introduced a policy that has no upper age limit. Pet insurance policies vary widely from insurer to insurer but generally you’ll find that a pet insurance company will not take on a new dog after age 8 or 9 and maybe a couple of years longer for a cat. They will often renew an existing policy beyond that age but with restrictions on certain parts of the policy.The new Liverpool Victoria policy allows you to take out insurance on a pet of any age over 8 weeks, but of course there are restrictions.

Cheaper (or should that be less expensive) pet insurance policies tend to fall into two camps, either they restrict payment on any single ailment to 12 months or they restrict the maximum amount that they will pay out for each condition - or even a combination of the two.

The new Liverpool Vic product offers both choices. Cheaper of the two restricts payment to twelve months on any single ailment with a top limit of £5,000 whilst a more expensive option offers a total of £5,000 for a single ailment with no time limit. In both cases the excess payable on any claim is £60. An average annual premium for a 10-year-old cat on the Essential plan is £106 and £146 on Premier whilst a Labrador dog (prone to leg ailments in old age) is £198 and £306.

Now, as with most insurance, you have a decision to make. Does it make sense to insure or would you be better off sitting it out and stumping up for the vet bill?. It really is a toss of the coin thing, who knows what’s going to happen in the future?. For sure, there are certain people who much prefer to know that whatever happens to their pet, it will be paid for by the insurance company and obviously for those people pet insurance is essential.

In my own case I bought my dog, A Hungarian Vizsla, from the breeder when he was 4 months old. The breeder had insured him for a year and when that expired I let the policy lapse. Up until about age 9 he didn’t have any unexpected visits to the vet, just the normal booster injections etc which aren’t paid for by pet insurance in any case. Then at about 10 years of age he developed a limp in his shoulder. A few visits to specialists who all scratched their heads and said that they couldn’t see what the problem was ate up a thousand or more. Medication has cost a bit more. To be honest I don’t know if I’d have been better off with insurance. What you do have to remember that the insurance company will not cover existing medical conditions, so you can’t wait until the dog starts hobbling before insuring him. My fella’s now over 14 and he’s been worth every penny, he’s my best friend.