Posts Tagged ‘scams’

Scams Fiddles & Honest Claims

Wednesday, February 6th, 2008

Watched a fascinating fly on the wall documentary on Channel 4 last night. Scams Fiddles and Honest Claims was filmed in the Norwich Union insurance investigation department. Their “front man” told us that 1 in 10 claims is fraudulent or inflated and that last year they dealt with 20,000 fraudulent claims and they were expecting that figure to rise to 30,000 this year. The TV program had some huge holes in it but I’ll tell you about them as we go through the list.

First claimant was a lady who had submitted a claim for a £2,500 engagement ring left in a hotel safe in Egypt. The investigator went to see her ex-fiancee before meeting her and he handed over said ring (he’d taken it with him when they had split up). Once confronted with the ring, she had no option but to confess. She said that she needed the money and she’d been paying insurance for years so thought that they owed her something. It seemed that she worked in a pub and she said that she’d spoken to loads of people that were getting away with insurance fraud. The N.U. man told us that once insurance fraud was detected the company would do its best to get back any money already paid out, they would then cancel any other insurance that the client held and by doing this it would make it difficult or impossible for the villain to be able to get insurance from any other company.

The next case was an immigrant (he didn’t speak English and had an interpreter present) who claimed for £13,000 worth of electrical equipment such as flat screen tv, expensive camera etc. The investigator was very dubious about the claim because of the area of Manchester that the guy lived in. He didn’t believe that anybody in that area would own £13,000 worth of high quality electrical equipment. The suspect proceeded to produce the empty boxes for all of the stuff, plus receipts. The program said that 10 months later the claimant still hadn’t been paid out but it left you up in the air wondering if he was guilty or not.

In a short piece filmed in the N.U. office they showed a sophisticated machine that could show if a receipt had been tampered with, a bill for £3,000 had been altered to £8,000.

Another film clip showed a couple whose house had been flooded in Hull earlier this summer. Their total claim of £40,000 (with a different insurer) had been disallowed because a neighbour had phoned the insurance company to say that they saw the claimant taking a fridge and freezer out of a skip and putting them in his shed before claiming on them. The N.U. man was quick to point out that one single discrepancy in a claim could invalidate the entire claim and it seems that’s what had happened on this occasion. He also told of an instance where a lady phoned to arrange …2 hours after her house had been flooded!.

They were also investigating another claim where a builder was claiming for a stolen van where an anonymous tip-off had told them that it had been driven away by his mate. They were having trouble making this one stick because of lack of evidence, but it was very clear from the program that the insurance companies put a great deal of weight behind tip-offs and that you could be in serious trouble if you find yourself in this position. The moral seems to be not to fall out with friends or neighbours.

The final two clips involved organised gangs defrauding the insurance companies. In the first one the investigators had uncovered a huge ring of people that were having “accidents” amongst themselves. In every case it was reported that a car had rear-ended theirs and pushed it into a tree or a lamp post. When they visited one of the claimants (Mr Bafanya) he was asked to explain what had happened. He recounted how a car had hit him and pushed his car into a lamp post. Unfortunately, on the claim form he had said that his car had been pushed into a tree. The claim was dismissed. The other scam involved a gang of people who were slamming on their brakes when approaching the entrance to an empty roundabout. The innocent (but careless) motorists behind them were shunting them up the rear and when you hit another car up the arse it’s ALWAYS your fault, so they were able to claim against the other drivers insurance and presumably pocket the proceeds.

A really interesting program, there’s a number of video clips from the program on the web page, well worth a watch.

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!