Car Insurance FAQs (U-Z)
Q : Have looked at your site with great
interest and have a question to pose for your FAQ section. My
car was a total loss after an accident and was not my fault, is
it possible to claim (under uninsured losses) for the further
expenses incurred in replacing the car? Eg time off work,
vehicle history checks, inspections, hire car.
A : You can reclaim any reasonable expense that
a court would award you. Assuming you are making the efforts to
replace the car whilst awaiting the settlement cheque, the
costs involved in finding a replacement for your car could come
under 'general inconvenience' and car hire is certainly
claimable. Where you can produce a receipt or documented
evidence of a loss, such as an invoice for car hire, you should
not experience any difficulty. Where you are claiming for
general inconvenience, the figure is usually negotiable. Some
third party insurers will be more generous than others.The
problems start to arise when you claim for costs incurred after
you have been sent the cheque for your total loss value.
Insurers seem to think that you can then wave a magic wand and
a replacement car just appears. i.e. they are more reluctant to
pay up for losses incurred at this stage. At the end of the
day, if you don't get what you think you should, go for a
hearing in the small claims track of your county court.
Q : I am writing with regards to claiming for
Loss of Vehicle use resulting from a Road Traffice Accident. I
would appreciate it if you could provide information as to the
rates at which u can claim, for loss of vehicle use per
A : The rate is usually negotiable. In my
experience, most reasonable insurers would settle at £10 a
day/£70 per week for short term loss of use. If you are looking
at longer term then £50 a week would seem reasonable. If you
want more, you would need to be able to justify it.
Q : Why do I have to accept a total loss when
my car could be repaired for more money?
A : This question was considered in the Courts
some years ago. Darbyshire V Warran (1963) held that an owner
of an old car cannot expect to have it repaired at a cost
greater than its market balue unless the car is uniquie and
irreplaceable and where the car is readily replaceable, the
measure of damage shall be the vehicle's market value.
"I was on my way to see an unconscious patient who
and was blocked by a tanker"
|Extracts taken from actual claim
forms submitted to
a number of UK car insurance companies
UK Motoring Conviction Codes